Saturday, March 19, 2011

I'm a believe in thermograms to ensure better breast health

I just found out about thermography. Actually, I've known about it for years, but was unable to find a site that did it. What I didn't know is that it detects cancer at least 5 years before normal MRIs and CTs do, since thermograms detect heat and not cell masses, which must be large enough to be seen. The other benefit of thermograms is that there is no radiation and there is NO PAIN. There is no breast compression. They just take photos of your breast. In fact they could do the entire body, much more cheaply and safer than MRI or CT. A fraction of the cost, in fact. (No wonder it fell out of favor since MRIs came to vogue.) Did you ever wonder if your cancer came back somewhere other than your breast. Or what was happening w. your reconstructed breast. Or how you could avoid the pain of squashing your dense breasts? Here's you answer. Women there IS a better way. Don't take NO for an answer. These sounds like much better odds and lots of pluses to me versus what they are currently offering as options. DEMAND IT as part of health reform. Yet insurance won't cover it. When you understand the benefits of thermogram, there will be no going back. WHy shouldn't we have a choice of what we want done? Cancer takes years to develop. Don't think it grows so fast that you can go from nothing to stage 4 in six months. It had to be growing way before that, undetected.

No comments:

Post a Comment